Well I am happy that you see this kind of writing is indeed very much like the its parallel on the right. Both serve to enrage their readership rather than inform them. Both serve to tear down approaches taken by the other, instead of exploring the nuance compromise paths that be the only durable paths forward. (I do think the Trump right lives on this kind of stuff to a greater degree. Still it is ugly no matter from where it comes.) (NOTE: I only have modest knowlege of all of your writings, so this is a more general statement, than an attack on your writing specifically.)