putting SC oral arguments on TV would be a bad thing. present congressional meetings are little more than made-for-TV-political speech. They cannot speak plainly to find ways forward because any words said will be weaponized against themselves. so many truths must just never be said. that is no way to make progress.

I don't think he is a grifter. that is too strong. but he is unethical. why I want to understand is how could this possibly go on for this long and the FBI not figure this out? These folks are too important to not watch.

and I blame the court itself for not having clear rules. even now, the court is not clarifying that his behavior was wrong. still no formal guidance which he is in violation of.

Finally I want to applaud your blending of both sides of Clarence. quite rare on medium.